μετατιθεμένης γὰρ τῆς ἱερωσύνης ἐξ ἀνάγκης καὶ νόμου μετάθεσις γίνεται.

metatithemenes gar tes ierosunes ex anagkes kai nomou metathesis ginetai.

translato enim sacerdotio necesse est ut et legis translatio fiat

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For the priesthood being changed, of necessity there is also a change of the law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

But just as there was a change in The Priesthood, in this way there was also a change in The Law.

But just as there was a change in The Priesthood, in this way there was also a change in The Law.

For, the priesthood being changed, there takes place of necessity a change of law also.

For, the priesthood being changed, there takes place of necessity a change of law also.

For the priesthood being translated, it is necessary that a translation also be made of the law.

For the priesthood being translated, it is necessary that a translation also be made of the law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well.

For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well.

When a different kind of priesthood is established, the regulations for those priests are different.

When a different kind of priesthood is established, the regulations for those priests are different.

For when there is a change of the priesthood, there must be a change of law as well.

For when there is a change of the priesthood, there must be a change of law as well.

When a change in the priesthood takes place, there must also be a change in the Law.

When a change in the priesthood takes place, there must also be a change in the Law.

For when the priesthood changes, a change in the law must come as well.

For when the priesthood changes, a change in the law must come as well.

For when the priesthood is changed, of necessity there takes place a change of law also.

For when the priesthood is changed, of necessity there takes place a change of law also.

For when the priesthood is changed, the law must be changed also.

For when the priesthood is changed, the law must be changed also.

And if the priesthood is changed, the law must also be changed to permit it.

And if the priesthood is changed, the law must also be changed to permit it.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For when the priesthood changes, a change of Law also of necessity takes place.

For when the priesthood changes, a change of Law also of necessity takes place.

For the priesthood being changed, there is of necessity a change made also in the law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is of necessity a change made also in the law.

When there is a change in the kind of priest like that, there must also be a change in the law.

for the priesthood being changed, of necessity also, of the law a change doth come,

For when the family group of religious leaders changed, the Law had to be changed also.

For if the priesthood is changed, then the Law must be changed.

because when there is a change in the priesthood there must be a corresponding change in the law as well.

And when God sends a new kind of priest, his law must be changed to permit it. As we all know, Christ did not belong to the priest-tribe of Levi, but came from the tribe of Judah, which had not been chosen for priesthood; Moses had never given them that work.

For when there is any change in the priesthood, there must also be a change in the Law.

For when the priesthood is changed, of necessity there takes place a change of law also.

For the priesthood being transposed, there is made of necessity a translation also of the law.

For when there is a change of the priesthood, there must be a change of law as well.

For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is of necessity an alteration of the law [concerning the priesthood] as well.

And when a different kind of priest comes, the law must be changed, too.

If the priesthood of Levi and Aaron, which provided the framework for the giving of the law, could really make people perfect, there wouldn’t have been need for a new priesthood like that of Melchizedek. But since it didn’t get the job done, there was a change of priesthood, which brought with it a radical new kind of law. There is no way of understanding this in terms of the old Levitical priesthood, which is why there is nothing in Jesus’ family tree connecting him with that priestly line.

For when the priesthood is changed, by necessity a change in the law also happens.

For whenever the priesthood is altered, there is necessarily an alteration in the law as well.

For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well.

Now no doubt if the priesthood is translated, then of necessity the law must be translated also.

For when the priesthood is changed, there also has to be a change in the law.

For why when the priesthood is translated, it is need [it is needful] that also [the] translation of the law be made.

Change the priesthood, after all, and you’re bound to change the law—

And when the rules for selecting a priest are changed, the Law must also be changed.

For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well.

We may go further. If it be possible to bring men to spiritual maturity through the Levitical priestly system (for that is the system under which the people were given the Law), why does the necessity arise for another priest to make his appearance after the order of Melchizedek, instead of following the normal priestly calling of Aaron? For if there is a transference of priestly powers, there will necessarily follow an alteration of the Law regarding priesthood. He who is described as our High Priest belongs to another tribe, no member of which had ever attended the altar! For it is a matter of history that our Lord was a descendant of Judah, and Moses made no mention of priesthood in connection with that tribe.

For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well.

For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well.

When the order of the priest changes, there has to be a change in the Law as well.

For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is of necessity a change of the law [concerning the priesthood] as well.

For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well.

When there is a change of priesthood, there is necessarily a change of law as well.

For when the priesthood is changed, of necessity there takes place a change of law also.

And when a different ·kind of priest [priesthood; priestly line] comes, the law must be changed, too.

For whenever the priesthood is altered, out of necessity an alteration of law also takes place.

For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well.

A change of the priestly system requires a change of law.

For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

For if the system of cohanim is transformed, there must of necessity occur a transformation of Torah.

If the kind of priest is changed, then the law must be changed also.

For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well.

For when there is a "changing of the guard" of the Kehunah (Priesthood), this behechrach (necessarily) also affects the Torah [Isa 42:4].

When a different kind of priesthood is established, the regulations for those priests are different.

For a change in the priesthood necessitates a change in the law.

And when a different kind of priest comes, then the law must be changed too.

And when a different kind of priest comes, the law must be changed, too.

For when the priesthood changes, of necessity there is a change of the law also.

For when the priesthood is changed, the law must be changed also.

For the priesthood being changed, of necessity there is also a change of law.