nec cogitatis quia expedit nobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo et non tota gens pereat
Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.
Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.
Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.
nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.
nor do you consider that it is expedient for us that one man should die for the people, and not that the whole nation should perish.”
nor consider that it is expedient for us that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.”
nor do ye take account that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.
“And you do not consider that is profitable for us that one man should die instead of the nation, and not that the whole nation perish.”
nor consider that it is profitable for you that one man die for the people, and not that the whole nation perish.
Neither do you consider that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.
nor do ye take account that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.
Nor do you understand that it is better for you that one man should die for the people, not that the whole nation should perish.”
You haven't even considered this: It is better for one man to die for the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed."
You're not considering that it is to your advantage that one man should die for the people rather than the whole nation perish."
You don't realize that it is better for you to have one man die for the people than to have the whole nation destroyed."
You do not realize that it is more to your advantage to have one man die for the people than for the whole nation to perish."
nor do you take into account that it is expedient for you that one man die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish."
You do not realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish."
You don't realize that it's better for you that one man should die for the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed."
Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.
You do not reflect that it is to your interest that one man should die for the people rather than the whole nation perish."
nor do you consider that it is advantageous for us that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish."
It is better that one man should die on behalf of our people. That is better than if all Israel's people should die.’
nor reason that it is good for us that one man may die for the people, and not the whole nation perish.'
Do you not see it is better for one man to die for the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed?”
“Nor do you consider that it is expedient for us that one Man die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish.”
what you don’t understand is that it’s better for you that one man should die for the people so the whole nation won’t perish.
let this one man die for the people—why should the whole nation perish?”
You do not seem to realize that it is better for us that one man die for the people rather than the whole nation be destroyed.”
nor do you take into account that it is better for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish.”
nor consider that it is expedient for us that one man should die for the people, and not that the whole nation be lost.
You’re not considering that it is to your advantage that one man should die for the people rather than the whole nation perish.”
Nor do you understand or reason out that it is expedient and better for your own welfare that one man should die on behalf of the people than that the whole nation should perish (be destroyed, ruined).
You don’t realize that it is better for one man to die for the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed.”
Then one of them—it was Caiaphas, the designated Chief Priest that year—spoke up, “Don’t you know anything? Can’t you see that it’s to our advantage that one man dies for the people rather than the whole nation be destroyed?” He didn’t say this of his own accord, but as Chief Priest that year he unwittingly prophesied that Jesus was about to die sacrificially for the nation, and not only for the nation but so that all God’s exile-scattered children might be gathered together into one people.
You do not even consider that it is better for us that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish.”
Or do you not realize that it is to your advantage that one man should die for the people and that the whole nation should not perish?”
You do not understand that it is better for you to have one man die for the people than to have the whole nation destroyed.”
nor yet consider that it is better for us that one man die for the people, and not that all the people perish.
Don't you realize that it is better for you to have one man die for the people, instead of having the whole nation destroyed?”
nor think, that it speedeth to you, that one man die for the people, and that all the folk perish not.
“You haven’t worked it out! This is what’s best for you: let one man die for the people, rather than the whole nation being wiped out.”
Don't you know it is better for one person to die for the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed?”
you do not understand that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation should not perish.”
But one of them, Caiaphas, who was High Priest that year, addressed the meeting: “You plainly don’t understand what is involved here. You do not realise that it would be a good thing for us if one man should die for the sake of the people—instead of the whole nation being destroyed.” (He did not make this remark on his own initiative but, since he was High Priest that year, he was in fact inspired to say that Jesus was going to die for the nation’s sake—and in fact not for that nation only, but to bring together into one family all the children of God scattered throughout the world.) From that day then, they planned to kill him. As a consequence Jesus made no further public appearance among the Jews but went away to the countryside on the edge of the desert, and stayed with his disciples in a town called Ephraim. The Jewish Passover was approaching and many people went up from the country to Jerusalem before the actual Passover, to go through a ceremonial cleansing. They were looking for Jesus there and kept saying to one another as they stood in the Temple, “What do you think? Surely he won’t come to the festival?”
You do not understand that it is better for you to have one man die for the people than to have the whole nation destroyed.”
You do not understand that it is better for you to have one man die for the people than to have the whole nation destroyed.’
You don’t see that it is better for you that one man die for the people rather than the whole nation be destroyed.”
Nor do you understand that it is expedient and politically advantageous for you that one man die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish.”
Nor do you understand that it is better for you that one man should die for the people, not that the whole nation should perish.”
nor do you consider that it is better for you that one man should die instead of the people, so that the whole nation may not perish.”
nor are you taking into account that it is in your best interest that one man die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish instead.”
You don’t realize that it is better [L for you] for one man to die for the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed.”
You don’t take into account that it is better for you that one man die for the people rather than for the whole nation to be destroyed.”
you do not understand that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation should not perish.”
You don’t realize what is good for you. It is better if one man dies for the people than if the whole nation is destroyed.”
Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.
You don’t see that it’s better for you if one man dies on behalf of the people, so that the whole nation won’t be destroyed.”
You do not understand. It is better for us if one person dies for the people. Then the whole nation will not be broken down.'
You do not understand that it is better for you to have one man die for the people than to have the whole nation destroyed.’
Nor do you consider that it is a bedievedike (expedient) thing for you that one man should die on behalf of HaAm and not that all the nation should perish. [YONAH 1:12 15; YESHAYAH 53:8]
You haven’t even considered this: It is better for one man to die for the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed.”
nor do you consider that it is expedient for us that one man should die for the people, that the whole nation should not perish.”
It is better for one man to die for the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed. But you don’t realize this.”
It is better for one man to die for the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed. But you don’t realize this.”
Nor do you consider that it is profitable for you that one man should die for the people, and the whole nation not perish.”
You do not realise that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish.’
nor do you consider that it is better for you that one Man die for the people, and the whole nation not perish”.
Want to give us your feedback? Suggestions?
Would like to help?
Click here to become a Patreon. Entry level is no charge:
www.patreon.com/ScriptureAwakened Thank you!