Μὴ ὁ νόμος ἡμῶν κρίνει τὸν ἄνθρωπον ἐὰν μὴ ἀκούσῃ ⸂πρῶτον παρʼ αὐτοῦ⸃ καὶ γνῷ τί ποιεῖ;

Me o nomos emon krinei ton anthropon ean me akouse [?]proton par' autou[?] kai gno ti poiei;

numquid lex nostra iudicat hominem nisi audierit ab ipso prius et cognoverit quid faciat

Does our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he does?

Does our law judge any man, before it hears him, and knows what he does?

Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he doeth?

Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he doeth?

“Does our law judge a man before it hears him and knows what he is doing?”

“Doth our law judge any man before it hear him and know what he doeth?”

Doth our law judge a man, except it first hear from himself and know what he doeth?

“Does our Written Law condemn a man unless one shall hear him first and know what he has done?”

Does our law judge a man before it have first heard from himself, and know what he does?

Doth our law judge any man, unless it first hear him, and know what he doth?

Doth our law judge a man, except it first hear from himself and know what he doeth?

“Does our law judge a man without first giving him a hearing and learning what he does?”

"Do Moses' Teachings enable us to judge a person without first hearing that person's side of the story? We can't judge a person without finding out what that person has done."

Our law doesn't judge a man before it hears from him and knows what he's doing, does it?""

"Surely our Law does not condemn a person without first hearing from him and finding out what he is doing, does it?"

"Our law doesn't condemn a man unless it first hears from him and learns what he is doing, does it?"

"Our Law does not judge a man unless it first hears from him and knows what he is doing, does it?"

"Does our law condemn a man without first hearing him to find out what he has been doing?"

"Is it legal to convict a man before he is given a hearing?" he asked.

Doth our law judge any man before it heareth him, and knoweth what he doeth?

"Does our Law," he asked, "judge a man without first hearing what he has to say and ascertaining what his conduct is?"

"Does our law judge a man, unless it first hears from him personally and knows what he does?"

‘We must find out first what this man has done. Then we can decide if it is right to punish him. Our law says that we must listen to him first.’

`Doth our law judge the man, if it may not hear from him first, and know what he doth?'

“Our Law does not say a man is guilty before he has been in court and before we know what he has done.”

“Does our Law judge a man before it hears him, and knows what he has done?”

Nicodemus: Does our law condemn someone without first giving him a fair hearing and learning something about him?

“Is it legal to convict a man before he is even tried?” he asked.

“Does our Law allow us to pass judgment on someone without first giving him a hearing to ascertain what he is doing?”

“Does our Law judge a man unless it first hears from him and knows what he is doing?”

Does our law judge any man before it hears him and knows what he does?

“Our law doesn’t judge a man before it hears from him and knows what he’s doing, does it?”

Does our Law convict a man without giving him a hearing and finding out what he has done?

“Our law does not judge a person without hearing him and knowing what he has done.”

Nicodemus, the man who had come to Jesus earlier and was both a ruler and a Pharisee, spoke up. “Does our Law decide about a man’s guilt without first listening to him and finding out what he is doing?”

“Does our law condemn a man before we hear from him and find out what he’s doing?”

“Surely our law does not · judge a man unless it first hears from him and finds out what he is doing, does it?”

“Our law does not judge people without first giving them a hearing to find out what they are doing, does it?”

Does our law judge any man before it hears him and knows what he has done?

“According to our Law we cannot condemn people before hearing them and finding out what they have done.”

Whether our law deemeth a man, but it have first heard of him [no but first it hear of him], and know what he doeth?

“Our law doesn’t condemn a man, does it, unless first you hear his side of the story and find out what he’s doing?”

“Our Law doesn't let us condemn people before we hear what they have to say. We cannot judge them before we know what they have done.”

“Does our law judge a man without first giving him a hearing and learning what he does?”

One of their number, Nicodemus (the one who had previously been to see Jesus), remarked to them, “But surely our Law does not condemn the accused without hearing what he has to say, and finding out what he has done?”

“Our law does not judge people without first giving them a hearing to find out what they are doing, does it?”

‘Our law does not judge people without first giving them a hearing to find out what they are doing, does it?’

“Our Law doesn’t judge someone without first hearing him and learning what he is doing, does it?”

“Does our Law convict someone without first giving him a hearing and finding out what he is [accused of] doing?”

“Does our law judge a man without first giving him a hearing and learning what he does?”

“Does our law condemn a person before it first hears him and finds out what he is doing?”

“Our Law does not judge the person unless it first hears from him and knows what he is doing, does it?”

“·Our law does not [L Does our law…?] judge a person without hearing him and knowing what he has done.”

“Our Torah doesn’t judge a man unless it first hears from him and knows what he’s doing, does it?”

“Does our law judge a man without first giving him a hearing and learning what he does?”

“Does our law find a man guilty without hearing him first? Doesn’t it want to find out what he is doing?”

Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he doeth?

“Our Torah doesn’t condemn a man — does it? — until after hearing from him and finding out what he’s doing.”

He said, `Is it right to judge any man by our law before we hear him and learn what he has done?'

‘Our law does not judge people without first giving them a hearing to find out what they are doing, does it?’

Surely Torateinu (Our Torah) judges not the Man unless it hears first from the Man himself and has da’as of what he does, does it? [Dt 1:16; 17:6; Ex 23:1]

“Do Moses’ Teachings enable us to judge a person without first hearing that person’s side of the story? We can’t judge a person without finding out what that person has done.”

“Does our law judge a man before it hears him and knows what he is doing?”

“Our law will not let us judge anyone without first hearing them and finding out what they have done.”

“Our law does not judge a man without hearing him. We cannot judge him until we know what he has done.”

“Our law does not condemn a man unless it first hears from him and knows what he is doing, does it?”

‘Does our law condemn a man without first hearing him to find out what he has been doing?’

“Our Law does not judge the person unless it first hears from him, and knows what he is doing, does it ?”